Cristina Belderrain wrote: > On 10/9/06, Tomi NA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> This is *exactly* what I was thinking. Like Stefan, I believe the >> nutch analyzer is a good foundation and should therefore be extended >> to support the "or" operator, and possibly additional capabilities >> when the need arises. >> >> t.n.a. > > Tomi, why would you extend Nutch's analyzer when Lucene's analyzer, > which does exactly what you want, is already there?
To what I understood so far in this thread the Nutch analyser/query-whatever seems to be more targeted and provides additional features regarding distributed search as well as maybe speed-improvements due to it's nature etc. (Correct me if I'm wrong.) One idea that has come up was to offer both as alternatives so you could use Lucene-based queries if you need it's features on the one hand but can live with restrictions on the other. However due to what has been mentioned so far it seems that Lucene-queries by default can only be on document-content (is that right?) not e.g. site:www.example.org. Hmm ... PS: Thank you all for help offered so far in this thread on how to get Lucene-queries going. Unfortunately I couldn't make much use of "just simply extend it here and there ..." :-( Regards, Stefan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Nutch-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nutch-general
