2006/10/10, Cristina Belderrain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 10/9/06, Tomi NA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This is *exactly* what I was thinking. Like Stefan, I believe the > > nutch analyzer is a good foundation and should therefore be extended > > to support the "or" operator, and possibly additional capabilities > > when the need arises. > > > > t.n.a. > > Tomi, why would you extend Nutch's analyzer when Lucene's analyzer, > which does exactly what you want, is already there?
Stefan basically answered that question, but basically, my opinion is that Nutch's analyzer does it's job well, but only lacks one obvious query capability: the "or" search. The fact that several users here need this kind of functionality suggests it's not the beginning of a landslide of new required capabilities. Lucene's analyzer, on the other hand, is completely inadequate in this respect if search is necessarily bound to a single (content) field. In conclusion, my position is pragmatic: I welcome the simplest solution to implement the "or" search. I just believe that it'd be easiest to do that extending the nutch Analyzer. t.n.a. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Nutch-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nutch-general
