I don't see them helping any. Headings without content are pointless. I've forwarded your email to somebody far more knowledgable than I for an answer.
Keri Henare +64 21 874 552 On 3/02/2009, at 12:39 PM, Stig Manning <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi NZPHPUG, > > As far as I understand there is no SEO benefit to having CSS- > rollover navigation full of heading-links, > for example: > > <a href="somepage.html" id="btn-1"><h4>Somepage</h4></a> > <a href="somepage2.html" id="btn-2"><h4>Somepage2</h4></a> > <a href="somepage3.html><h4>Somepage3</h4></a> > <a href="somepage4.html><h4>Somepage4</h4></a> > > The above example is not semantically correct, but does it improve > SEO by making the links more important? > Before I go and make the suggestion to remove the h4s and replace > them with something that doesn't affect the weighting, I would like > to confirm that this is the case. > This is how I would go about creating CSS-rollover navigation: > > <a href="somepage.html" id="somepage-button"><b>Somepage</b></a> > > As far as I see it, the above HTML is fine and doesn't mess with the > semantics of the page. > > Cheers, > Stig > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ NZ PHP Users Group: http://groups.google.com/group/nzphpug To post, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
