Thanks Nico, that does help! Yes, the idea at the moment (subject to user testing) is that Colleges & Schools, Subjects and Campus Life will be the top level for our categories, so we should be able to determine into which of those categories the sub-categories (e.g. Biological Sciences) fall easily, allowing us to create those groupings.
Cheers, Allison On Aug 2, 2012, at 1:54 AM, Nicolaas Matthijs wrote: > Hi Alison, > >> 1) Does this selection of tags include both categories and tags? > > Yes, it does. > >> 2) How are the "top 10" determined? > > The top 10 is determined from the entire result list. > >> 3) Are the rest of the tags stored somewhere else so that we could access >> them if we wanted to display more? >> >> For example, in lieu of implementing facets this release, we are considering >> grouping the tags in some way, e.g. on a search for "biology" you may be >> presented with a grouping of tags something like this: >> >> Colleges & Schools: College of Letters & Science Biological Sciences >> <show more> >> Subjects: Biological Sciences >> <show more> >> Campus Life: Professional; Service >> Tags: fertilization; RNA; karyotype; nucleus; >> glycogen; chromosome; DNA; mammal; bacteria; Molecular Biology Majors Group > > I'm not entirely sure how you would achieve this classification, unless of > course "Colleges & Schools", "Subjects" and "Campus Life" were your > categories. Nonetheless, it looks like the search feeds currently expose up > to 100 of the most commonly used tags, so all of those could be used in a UI > without altering the back-end feed. > > > Hope that helps, > Nicolaas Allison Bloodworth Senior User Experience Designer Educational Technology Services University of California, Berkeley abloodwo...@berkeley.edu 510-289-6627
_______________________________________________ oae-dev mailing list oae-dev@collab.sakaiproject.org http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/oae-dev
