[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-13?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13230046#comment-13230046
]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on OAK-13:
--------------------------------------
thanks for bringing this up.
i completely agree with angela (once again ;).
org.apache.jackrabbit.mk.* is a real mess.
there are 2 largely independent mk implementations
which IMO is totally confusing.
while i am convinced that we should allow for
alternative mk implementations we should
separate them with independent source trees/poms.
everything else doesn't make sense IMO.
i would also suggest to designate a 'default'
implementation for the oak project. that 'default'
could serve as a reference implementation of
the MicroKernel API.
> Cleanup org.apache.jackrabbit.mk
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-13
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-13
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: core
> Reporter: angela
>
> imo we should clean up the org.apache.jackrabbit.mk.* packages that are
> currently
> located in the oak-core module.
> for me it is really hard to destinguish between code that is really part of
> the
> productive code base for the oak project and code that is purely experimental
> chunk and leftover.
> in order to become familiar with the code that would be helpful for me and
> anybody else that will contribute to the project.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
