[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-13?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13291035#comment-13291035
 ] 

Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-13:
-----------------------------------

I will take some more time until the index implementation and API is ready for 
larger refactorings. And larger refactorings will be needed, we might even 
decide that the whole 'content index' mechanism (IndexWrapper, Indexer) is not 
needed once we have a Lucene implementation (if it turns out this 
implementation is much faster than the content index). I suggest we wait with 
refactoring this area until we have performance data from a Lucene index 
implementation.

A bit simpler might be the MicroKernelFactory (I wanted to replace it with an 
interface). Such an interface could also be moved to oak-mk or oak-commons I 
guess.
                
> Cleanup org.apache.jackrabbit.mk
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-13
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-13
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: angela
>
> imo we should clean up the org.apache.jackrabbit.mk.* packages that are 
> currently
> located in the oak-core module.
> for me it is really hard to destinguish between code that is really part of 
> the
> productive code base for the oak project and code that is purely experimental
> chunk and leftover.
> in order to become familiar with the code that would be helpful for me and
> anybody else that will contribute to the project.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to