Hi, Thanks a lot!
> I've only included the 90th percentile I usually look at "N" first :-) There is one strange result: SmallFileWriteTest; Oak-Segment: 90%=257, max=14763 - Maybe the warmup phase is too short, or the test isn't that great? As for SmallFileReadTest and SmallFileWriteTest with Oak-Mongo: I think I know what the problem is; it doesn't seem to be related to BLOB handling at all (actually performance is the same without the BLOB), but partially related to the "split documents" that should be added in the near future. Also, it seems to be partially related to what the test does (repeatedly adding and removing the same nodes). Regards, Thomas On 7/2/13 10:11 PM, "Jukka Zitting" <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> wrote: >Hi, > >On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> >wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Jukka Zitting >><jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Jukka Zitting >>><jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Here's a few more simple benchmark results to show where we are: >>> >>> Updated numbers with latest Oak: >> >> And another one: > >Here we go again: > > # ReadPropertyTest 90% > Jackrabbit 48 > Oak-Default 38 > Oak-Mongo 39 > Oak-Segment 41 > Oak-Tar 40 > > # SmallFileReadTest 90% > Jackrabbit 94 > Oak-Default 258 > Oak-Mongo 421 > Oak-Segment 23 > Oak-Tar 20 > > # SmallFileWriteTest 90% > Jackrabbit 424 > Oak-Default 349 > Oak-Mongo 1376 > Oak-Segment 257 > Oak-Tar 116 > >For simplicy I've only included the 90th percentile figure (smaller is >better). See https://gist.github.com/jukka/5912460 for the full >details. > >The ReadPropertyTest figures were again lagging behind those of >Jackrabbit, but my changes earlier today got us back to the same >range. However, we've still regressed somewhat from the level we >reached in early June. > >BR, > >Jukka Zitting
