>
> First step would be to upgrade to 1.24.0
>
We just upgraded from 1.5 last year. I guess I will not find much trouble
upgrading from 1.12, right?
the output of "ipconfig -a" for that machine would be helpful.
>
Here is the output, MAC changed and IP addresses hidden/changed.
docker0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 02:4E:C5:4B:C5:E5
inet addr:xxx.xx.x.x Bcast:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Mask:xxx.xxx.x.x
UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 06:C5:FB:F8:CF:C7
inet addr:xxx.xx.xx.xx Bcast:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Mask:xxx.xxx.xxx.xx
inet6 addr: fe80::4c8:fafd:fec1:cfc0/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:9001 Metric:1
RX packets:2694 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:2721 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:306659 (299.4 KiB) TX bytes:343151 (335.1 KiB)
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:65536 Metric:1
RX packets:35 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:35 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:81477 (79.5 KiB) TX bytes:81477 (79.5 KiB)
El mar., 3 mar. 2020 a las 9:29, Julian Reschke (<[email protected]>)
escribió:
> On 03.03.2020 15:15, jorgeeflorez . wrote:
> > Hi Julian, thanks for your reply,
> >
> > a) I am using version 1.12.0.
> > b) As far as I know, Oak is not running in Docker. It is running in the
> > JVM installed on the Linux machine, but not inside Docker.
> > c) I see... some things may add a "low" mac address to the machine,
> > interfering with the cluster info.
> >
> > Jorge
> > ...
>
>
> First step would be to upgrade to 1.24.0. If that doesn't change things,
> the output of "ipconfig -a" for that machine would be helpful.
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
