On 03.03.2020 15:48, jorgeeflorez . wrote:
First step would be to upgrade to 1.24.0
We just upgraded from 1.5 last year. I guess I will not find much trouble
upgrading from 1.12, right?
1.5 was an unstable branch, you shouldn't use that in production anyway.
1.24.0 has replaced 1.12.0 as latest stable release.
the output of "ipconfig -a" for that machine would be helpful.
Here is the output, MAC changed and IP addresses hidden/changed.
docker0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 02:4E:C5:4B:C5:E5
inet addr:xxx.xx.x.x Bcast:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Mask:xxx.xxx.x.x
UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 06:C5:FB:F8:CF:C7
inet addr:xxx.xx.xx.xx Bcast:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Mask:xxx.xxx.xxx.xx
inet6 addr: fe80::4c8:fafd:fec1:cfc0/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:9001 Metric:1
RX packets:2694 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:2721 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:306659 (299.4 KiB) TX bytes:343151 (335.1 KiB)
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:65536 Metric:1
RX packets:35 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:35 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:81477 (79.5 KiB) TX bytes:81477 (79.5 KiB)
...
Ack. So yes, it probably would be good to extend the hack that we
introduced in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3885 for that
interface.
Can you open a Jira ticket for this?
Best regards, Julian
