Hi, Recently OAK-9712 [0] was created and quickly resolved, via the associated PR [1]. Between those two events, I commented on OAK-9712 with a question that I wanted to be clarified. It seems however that this question wasn't seen before the PR was merged.
I assume this was a simple oversight, as the change itself was pretty small. However, I wanted to draw some attention to this issue. It is important we still follow proper record keeping and procedures, even for small changes. Using this issue as an example: - Tickets should be created with a clear description of the scope of the change and proposed solution, if known. - Tickets should be assigned to someone who is taking responsibility to implement the change. - Open issues, questions, concerns, etc. in tickets and PRs must be addressed satisfactorily before code is committed. Thoughts? [0] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9712 [1] - https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/506 -MR
