oak-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] OAK-12415: Retry per-item version conflicts on Elasticsearch bulk updates [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [PR] OAK-12417: Avoid UUID allocation and add O(1) index for in-archive segment lookup [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12417: Avoid UUID allocation and add O(1) index for in-archive segment lookup [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12417: Avoid UUID allocation and add O(1) index for in-archive segment lookup [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12417: Avoid UUID allocation and add O(1) index for in-archive segment lookup [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [PR] OAK-12418: Log segment compaction node rate [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12418: Log segment compaction node rate [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [PR] OAK-12414: Simplify and pre-size list-record bucket construction in DefaultSegmentWriter [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12414: Simplify and pre-size list-record bucket construction in DefaultSegmentWriter [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12414: Simplify and pre-size list-record bucket construction in DefaultSegmentWriter [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12414: Simplify and pre-size list-record bucket construction in DefaultSegmentWriter [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12410): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-12411: Avoid allocation and cache hash code in Template.hashCode() [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12411: Avoid allocation and cache hash code in Template.hashCode() [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12411: Avoid allocation and cache hash code in Template.hashCode() [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [PR] OAK-12405 : initialize the comparator only once [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12405 : initialize the comparator only once [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12405 : initialize the comparator only once [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12405 : initialize the comparator only once [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12406): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/trunk): Workflow run "maven in /oak-segment-tar for org.bouncycastle:bcpkix-jdk15on - Update #1590113514" failed! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-12410: Create a Workaround for COLLECTIONS-900 in IteratorUtils [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12410: Create a Workaround for COLLECTIONS-900 in IteratorUtils [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12410: Create a Workaround for COLLECTIONS-900 in IteratorUtils [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12410: Create a Workaround for COLLECTIONS-900 in IteratorUtils [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12410: Create a Workaround for COLLECTIONS-900 in IteratorUtils [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12410: Create a Workaround for COLLECTIONS-900 in IteratorUtils [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12408): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12408): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12408): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12408): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-search-mongot: fix cursor batch size and drain-on-getSize() bugs [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-search-mongot: fix cursor batch size and drain-on-getSize() bugs [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-search-mongot: fix cursor batch size and drain-on-getSize() bugs [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] OAK-11089: Allow SegmentReferences/RecordNumbers to provide their memory estimates [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11089: Allow SegmentReferences/RecordNumbers to provide their memory estimates [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/oak-netty-4.1.137-trunk-cve-2026-75595-granite-74049): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/issue/OAK-12360): Workflow run "Commit Check" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/issue/OAK-12360): Workflow run "Commit Check" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/issue/OAK-12360): Workflow run "Commit Check" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/issue/OAK-12360): Workflow run "Commit Check" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/issue/OAK-12360): Workflow run "Commit Check" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/issue/OAK-12360): Workflow run "Commit Check" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/issue/OAK-12360): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/issue/OAK-12360): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/issue/OAK-12360): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/issue/OAK-12360): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/issue/OAK-12360): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/issue/OAK-12360): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/issue/OAK-12409): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/issue/OAK-12409): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/issue/OAK-12409): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/issue/OAK-12409): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-12409: bump netty to 4.1.138.Final [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12409: bump netty to 4.1.138.Final [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12409: bump netty to 4.1.138.Final [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12409: bump netty to 4.1.138.Final [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [PR] OAK: bump netty to 4.1.137.Final (CVE-2026-75595) [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK: bump netty to 4.1.137.Final (CVE-2026-75595) [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK: bump netty to 4.1.137.Final (CVE-2026-75595) [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [PR] OAK: bump netty to 4.1.137.Final (CVE-2026-75595) [1.22 backport] [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK: bump netty to 4.1.137.Final (CVE-2026-75595) [1.22 backport] [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12406): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12406): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12406): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12406): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12406): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12406): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12406): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12406): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12406): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12401): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-12406 IF and EXISTS functions for sparse function-based indexing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12406 IF and EXISTS functions for sparse function-based indexing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12406 IF and EXISTS functions for sparse function-based indexing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12406 IF and EXISTS functions for sparse function-based indexing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12406 IF and EXISTS functions for sparse function-based indexing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12406 IF and EXISTS functions for sparse function-based indexing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12406 IF and EXISTS functions for sparse function-based indexing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12406 IF and EXISTS functions for sparse function-based indexing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12406 IF and EXISTS functions for sparse function-based indexing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12406 IF and EXISTS functions for sparse function-based indexing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12406 IF and EXISTS functions for sparse function-based indexing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12406 IF and EXISTS functions for sparse function-based indexing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12406 IF and EXISTS functions for sparse function-based indexing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12406 IF and EXISTS functions for sparse function-based indexing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12406 IF and EXISTS functions for sparse function-based indexing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12406 IF and EXISTS functions for sparse function-based indexing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12406 IF and EXISTS functions for sparse function-based indexing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12406 IF and EXISTS functions for sparse function-based indexing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12406 IF and EXISTS functions for sparse function-based indexing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12406 IF and EXISTS functions for sparse function-based indexing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12406 IF and EXISTS functions for sparse function-based indexing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12406 IF and EXISTS functions for sparse function-based indexing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12406 IF and EXISTS functions for sparse function-based indexing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12406 IF and EXISTS functions for sparse function-based indexing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12406 IF and EXISTS functions for sparse function-based indexing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12406 IF and EXISTS functions for sparse function-based indexing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12406 IF and EXISTS functions for sparse function-based indexing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12406 IF and EXISTS functions for sparse function-based indexing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12406 IF and EXISTS functions for sparse function-based indexing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12406 IF and EXISTS functions for sparse function-based indexing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12406 IF and EXISTS functions for sparse function-based indexing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12406 IF and EXISTS functions for sparse function-based indexing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12406 IF and EXISTS functions for sparse function-based indexing [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12401): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12401): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12401): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-12408 : Journal gc.log in CompactionResult.skipped() when current generation is already compacted [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12408 : Journal gc.log in CompactionResult.skipped() when current generation is already compacted [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12408 : Journal gc.log in CompactionResult.skipped() when current generation is already compacted [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12408 : Journal gc.log in CompactionResult.skipped() when current generation is already compacted [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12408 : Journal gc.log in CompactionResult.skipped() when current generation is already compacted [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12408 : Journal gc.log in CompactionResult.skipped() when current generation is already compacted [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12408 : Journal gc.log in CompactionResult.skipped() when current generation is already compacted [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12408 : Journal gc.log in CompactionResult.skipped() when current generation is already compacted [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [PR] OAK-12401: cap the ISCHILDNODE cost estimate at 1000 (#3131) [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12401: cap the ISCHILDNODE cost estimate at 1000 (#3131) [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12401: cap the ISCHILDNODE cost estimate at 1000 (#3131) [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12407): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12407): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-12407: bump elasticsearch to v9.5.4 [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12407: bump elasticsearch to v9.5.4 [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12400_2): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12402): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12402): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12402): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12402): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12402): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-12400 : add opt-in flag to skip positional dangling-future-segment reclaim [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12400 : add opt-in flag to skip positional dangling-future-segment reclaim [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12400 : add opt-in flag to skip positional dangling-future-segment reclaim [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [PR] OAK-12404 - CompactionWriter.flush() persists partial writer before target writer [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12404 - CompactionWriter.flush() persists partial writer before target writer [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12404 - CompactionWriter.flush() persists partial writer before target writer [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12404 - CompactionWriter.flush() persists partial writer before target writer [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12404 - CompactionWriter.flush() persists partial writer before target writer [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12404 - CompactionWriter.flush() persists partial writer before target writer [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [PR] OAK-12402: Add allocation-free primitive checkArgument overloads to Validate [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12402: Add allocation-free primitive checkArgument overloads to Validate [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] OAK-10147: Many move operations may consume a lot of memory [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [PR] OAK-12401: estimate ISCHILDNODE/ISDESCENDANTNODE cost from the index's own path counts [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12401: cap the ISCHILDNODE cost estimate at 1000 [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/issue/OAK-12365): Workflow run "Commit Check" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/issue/OAK-12365): Workflow run "Commit Check" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12249-lazy-provisioning): Workflow run "Commit Check" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12249-lazy-provisioning): Workflow run "Commit Check" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12249-lazy-provisioning): Workflow run "Commit Check" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12249-lazy-provisioning): Workflow run "Commit Check" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12249-lazy-provisioning): Workflow run "Commit Check" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12249-lazy-provisioning): Workflow run "Commit Check" failed! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-12370: warn when a query uses a leading '/' in a property or column name [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12370: warn when a query uses a leading '/' in a property or column name [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12100): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-12100: account for nodeName condition in Lucene/Elastic index cost estimation [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12100: account for nodeName condition in Lucene/Elastic index cost estimation [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [PR] OAK-12100: account for nodeName condition in Lucene/Elastic index cost estimation- #3128 [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12100: account for nodeName condition in Lucene/Elastic index cost estimation- #3128 [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12100: account for nodeName condition in Lucene/Elastic index cost estimation- #3128 [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [PR] OAK-12370: warn when a query uses a leading '/' in a property or column name (#3127) [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12370: warn when a query uses a leading '/' in a property or column name (#3127) [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12370: warn when a query uses a leading '/' in a property or column name (#3127) [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12370: warn when a query uses a leading '/' in a property or column name (#3127) [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12100): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12100): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12370): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12370): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12370): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12370): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12400): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12307-coverage): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-12307: fix code coverage for IndexerMBeanImpl [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12307: fix code coverage for IndexerMBeanImpl [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12400): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12400): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12400): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-12400 : online revision cleanup can delete referenced segments on a store not written in compaction order [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12400 : online revision cleanup can delete referenced segments on a store not written in compaction order [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12400 : online revision cleanup can delete referenced segments on a store not written in compaction order [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12400 : online revision cleanup can delete referenced segments on a store not written in compaction order [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12400 : online revision cleanup can delete referenced segments on a store not written in compaction order [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12400 : online revision cleanup can delete referenced segments on a store not written in compaction order [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12400 : online revision cleanup can delete referenced segments on a store not written in compaction order [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [PR] OAK-12399: Lucene keeps jcr:score as a secondary sort key alongside a… [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12399: Lucene keeps jcr:score as a secondary sort key alongside an ordered property [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12399: Lucene keeps jcr:score as a secondary sort key alongside an ordered property [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/oak-search-mongot): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/oak-search-mongot): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/trunk): Workflow run "maven in /oak-segment-tar for org.bouncycastle:bcpkix-jdk15on - Update #1577376912" failed! GitBox
• [PR] oak-search-mongot poc [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] oak-search-mongot poc [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/trunk): Workflow run "maven in /oak-parent for org.apache.derby:derby - Update #1577376921" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12364): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-12173): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-12364: XPath queries fail to parse if they contain invalid XML characters (#3121) [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12364: XPath queries fail to parse if they contain invalid XML characters (#3121) [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12364: XPath queries fail to parse if they contain invalid XML characters (#3121) [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [PR] OAK-12364: XPath queries fail to parse if they contain invalid XML characters - #3084 [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-12364: XPath queries fail to parse if they contain invalid XML characters [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/issue/OAK-12364): Workflow run "Commit Check" failed! GitBox

• Earlier messages
• Later messages