[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6450?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16089787#comment-16089787
]
Robert Munteanu commented on OAK-6450:
--------------------------------------
[~chetanm] was kind enough to spell it out more be in an offline discussion -
for existing components we will keep using the FQCN with {{oak.security.name}},
but for new components added to trunk we are free to use a simpler name.
Obviously, I fully agree with this statement.
Chetan - do you have any other comments related to the patch?
> Stop relying on the service.pid property in SecurityProviderRegistration
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-6450
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6450
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: security
> Reporter: Robert Munteanu
> Assignee: Robert Munteanu
> Fix For: 1.8, 1.7.4
>
> Attachments:
> 0001-OAK-6450-Stop-relying-on-the-service.pid-property-in.patch,
> 0002-OAK-6450-Stop-relying-on-the-service.pid-property-in.patch
>
>
> As discussed in OAK-6111, we should stop relying on the {{service.pid}} OSGi
> property for tracking required services as it was incorrectly set so far by
> the {{maven-scr-plugin}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
