[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6450?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16096280#comment-16096280
 ] 

Robert Munteanu commented on OAK-6450:
--------------------------------------

[~anchela] - thank you for the review.

{quote} why are the RegistrationConstants located in 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.authorization package? that looks wrong to 
me as it is used also in non-authorization packages.{quote}

You're right, that does look a bit off. I did not find a proper place for it, 
but {{org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.spi.security}} looks good and I'll move the 
class there. When we split off the security.spi packages to a separate module 
it will be moved with all otehr classes.

{quote} i am not sure about the PN prefix with the RegistrationConstants. what 
does it stand for?{quote}

It stands for property name and I hoped it would be explicit. Apparently it's 
not :-) so I'll drop it.

I'll also take care of testing and documentation in the next revision of the 
patch.

> Stop relying on the service.pid property in SecurityProviderRegistration
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-6450
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6450
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: security
>            Reporter: Robert Munteanu
>            Assignee: Robert Munteanu
>             Fix For: 1.8, 1.7.5
>
>         Attachments: 
> 0001-OAK-6450-Stop-relying-on-the-service.pid-property-in.patch, 
> 0002-OAK-6450-Stop-relying-on-the-service.pid-property-in.patch
>
>
> As discussed in OAK-6111, we should stop relying on the {{service.pid}} OSGi 
> property for tracking required services as it was incorrectly set so far by 
> the {{maven-scr-plugin}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to