Agreed.  There's a bunch of interesting things that could be done to
bring OpenID and OAuth closer together.

On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Ashish Jain <iti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is worth exploring further at the next OpenID Summit (assuming there is
> interest). RPs that we talk to have overlapping use cases and it's not fair
> to their developers to have completely independent SDKs (different signing
> mechanism, on boarding process etc).
> -Ashish
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Ashish Jain
>
> Sr. Product Manager, PayPal Identity Services
>
> email: ashish.j...@paypal.com
>
> cell: 303-548-4325
>
> skype: itickr
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Robert Winch <rwi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> If you haven't seen this post, it may be of interest
>> http://hueniverse.com/2009/04/introducing-sign-in-with-twitter-oauth-style-connect/
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Paul Lindner <lind...@inuus.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> If a site has an api that returns a stable user identifier then OAuth can
>>> work fine as an SSO.  I wouldn't go so far as to call it bastardized..
>>> The big difference between OpenID and OAuth is the idiom used.  OpenID is
>>> designed to not require prior registration for use -- multiple relying
>>> parties and providers can interoperate using URLs and attribute exchange.
>>>  With OAuth you need a consumer key/secret for your site, and the APIs for
>>> attribute exchange change from provider to provider.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Chris Messina <chris.mess...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> OAuth can be used as a bastardized mechanism to do SSO, but it's not
>>>> really recommended.
>>>> OAuth only provides you with tokens, which could later be revoked,
>>>> effectively destroying the identity that you're relying on.
>>>> OpenID is the preferred way to achieve SSO because it provides you with
>>>> a stable, reusable identifier.
>>>> Twitter uses OAuth for SSO, but it's really kind of a mis-use of the
>>>> technology, although in practice it kind of solves the problem.
>>>> Essentially OpenID provides you with identity; OAuth provides you
>>>> authorization to do things on behalf of a user. Since you're doing 
>>>> something
>>>> on behalf of a user, you get a kind of temporary identity to do stuff but
>>>> it's much more fragile than OpenID.
>>>> Why don't you want to do OpenID?
>>>> Chris
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Adam <apcau...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> We currently use CAS for SSO.  I'd like to have SSO into gmail, but do
>>>>> not want to switch to OpenID.  Is it possible to use OAuth to login
>>>>> users into their gmail accounts?  Or is OAuth only meant to retrieve
>>>>> user data?
>>>>>
>>>>> I am currently using SignPost to connect to OAuth... if it matters.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "OAuth" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to oa...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>> oauth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Chris Messina
>>>> Open Web Advocate, Google
>>>>
>>>> Personal: http://factoryjoe.com
>>>> Follow me on Buzz: http://buzz.google.com/chrismessina
>>>> ...or Twitter: http://twitter.com/chrismessina
>>>>
>>>> This email is:   [ ] shareable    [X] ask first   [ ] private
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "OAuth" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to oa...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> oauth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en.
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "OAuth" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to oa...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> oauth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "OAuth" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to oa...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> oauth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "OAuth" group.
> To post to this group, send email to oa...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> oauth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OAuth" group.
To post to this group, send email to oa...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
oauth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en.

Reply via email to