> -----Original Message----- > From: Marius Scurtescu [mailto:mscurte...@google.com] > Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 4:37 PM > To: Eran Hammer-Lahav > Cc: OAuth WG > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] 'Scope' parameter proposal > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav > <e...@hueniverse.com> wrote: > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Marius Scurtescu [mailto:mscurte...@google.com] > >> Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 1:50 PM > > > >> I did a proof of concept implementation, with client, server and > >> protected resource support libraries, and the scope structure was never > an issue. > >> Actual client, server and resource code, does need to deal with > >> scopes, but this is not the generic code that would go into a library. > > > > Did your library handle unknown parameters, passing them through the call > stack? > > Yes, it did.
Did it hurt? :-) EHL _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
