is there a protocol of the interim meeting?
Am 01.06.2010 20:47, schrieb Peter Saint-Andre:
We discussed this a bit at the interim meeting, but I don't think we
came to any consensus.
On 6/1/10 12:46 PM, Torsten Lodderstedt wrote:
Is there anyone who can answer my questions?
Am 30.05.2010 17:56, schrieb Torsten Lodderstedt:
I have some questions regarding the WWW-Authenticate header's "scope"
attribute.
The spec states
"The "scope" attribute is a space-delimited list of URIs (relative or
absolute) indicating the required scope of the access token for
accessing the requested resource."
Which of the scope URIs are required for accessing the resource
server, at least one or all of them?
How is an interoperable OAuth2 client supposed to use this atttribute?
Shall the client copy the content into the scope parameter of a
subsequent authorization request?
What is the envisioned behavior if a client seeks for access
authorization to different resources, which happen to rely on the same
authorization server? Is the client allowed to combine the scope
attributes from the WWW-Authenticate header of both resources in a
single authorization flow? This would allow the client to obtain
authorization with a single flow. From my point of view, reducing the
number of authorization flows would improve user experience.
How is as equivalence of authorization servers determined (token-uri,
user-uri, both)?
regards,
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
