>> 
>> 
> 
>> How is a UMA requestor envisioned to discover the auth server?
> 
> On the Host side the user can tell it which AM (in UMA terms it's an
> Authorization Manager, some sort of extended AS) to use or it might be
> discovered via webfinger or similar means.
> 
> The process for requesters is up to discussion a bit right now. In my
> prototype the Host is telling the Requester which AM is registered to
> the resource it tries to access. Then client registration can start from
> there.

How does the Host tell the requester? I would imagine using host-meta, too.

regards,
Torsten.

> 
>> I think host-meta based client discovery could be to limited since it
>> does not allow (at least in my understanding) to serve different
>> clients (or their home web apps) on the same host. What about using
>> JRD or XRD? This would allow for a client-URL-related discovery.
> 
> You are right. The question here might be if the LRDD part is being used
> or if maybe directly point to the client spec which would save one
> redirection. Not sure if we need to add a type field in this case, too
> (e.g. if JRD or XRD). I would favour to use only one format (JRD) though.
> 
> 
> -- Christian
> 
>> What means for authentication a client against its home web app. do
>> you envision?
>> 
>> regards, Torsten.
>> 
>> Am 10.08.2010  um 21:31 schrieb Eve Maler <e...@xmlgrrl.com>:
>> 
>>> Folks-- The UMA group has produced the following I-D as input to
>>> the OAuth discovery/registration/binding discussion.  We wanted to
>>> set forth our requirements (knowing that there may be other
>>> requirements from the wider community) and propose some solutions
>>> that meet them.  If further discussion seems to warrant an updating
>>> of this draft, we're happy to do that.  (If you have interest in
>>> getting involved in UMA-specific work, feel free to drop me a
>>> note.)
>>> 
>>> Eve
>>> 
>>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-oauth-dyn-reg-v1-00.txt
>>> 
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>> 
>>>> From: IETF I-D Submission Tool <idsubmiss...@ietf.org> Date: 10
>>>> August 2010 12:23:59 PM PDT To: e...@xmlgrrl.com Cc:
>>>> c...@comlounge.net, m.p.machu...@ncl.ac.uk Subject: New Version
>>>> Notification for draft-oauth-dyn-reg-v1-00
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> A new version of I-D, draft-oauth-dyn-reg-v1-00.txt has been
>>>> successfully submitted by Eve Maler and posted to the IETF
>>>> repository.
>>>> 
>>>> Filename:     draft-oauth-dyn-reg-v1 Revision:     00 Title:
>>>> OAuth Dynamic Client Registration Protocol Creation_date:
>>>> 2010-08-10 WG ID:         Independent Submission Number_of_pages:
>>>> 20
>>>> 
>>>> Abstract: This specification proposes an OAuth Dynamic Client
>>>> Registration protocol.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> The IETF Secretariat.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Eve Maler http://www.xmlgrrl.com/blog 
>>> http://www.twitter.com/xmlgrrl http://www.linkedin.com/in/evemaler
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list 
>>> OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>> _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list 
>> OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
> 
> 
> -- 
> Christian Scholz                          Homepage: http://comlounge.net
> COM.lounge GmbH                                    http://mrtopf.de/blog
> Hanbrucher Str. 33                             http://twitter.com/mrtopf
> 52064 Aachen                                             Skype: HerrTopf
> Tel: +49 241 400 730 0                                  c...@comlounge.net
> Fax: +49 241 979 00 850                                      IRC: MrTopf
> 
> Podcasts:
> Der OpenWeb-Podcast (http://openwebpodcast.de)
> Data Without Borders (http://datawithoutborders.net)
> Politisches: http://politfunk.de/
> Technical: http://comlounge.tv/
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to