On 2010-09-25, at 7:52 PM, Eve Maler wrote: > It seems like you figured it out pretty quickly, given the message you sent > immediately after. :-)
> > Referencing another spec from the core spec using normative text is > effectively "including it by reference". I meant that I'm sympathetic (+1) to > signaling in core OAuth that signatures are to be considered an integral part > of it, and that if it makes sense to do so by pointing to a spec module that > is pointable-to by other specs that are not OAuth, that's fine (call it a > soft -1 to including the signature details directly in the core OAuth spec). > thanks for clarifying your view since it seemed you had +1 to having details in OAuth and +1 to referencing _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
