Trying a different DL... -- Andrew Arnott "I [may] not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it." - S. G. Tallentyre
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:38 AM, Andrew Arnott <andrewarn...@gmail.com>wrote: > The recent OAuth 2 specs seem to omit the scenario of a client that cannot > host or invoke a browser but could display a URL to the user and ask the > user to enter a PIN. Was this an intentional omission? If I am correct, > this forces those clients to continue to use OAuth 1.0, which is not only > less desirable but it will limit which services they can access. > > Thoughts? > -- > Andrew Arnott > "I [may] not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death > your right to say it." - S. G. Tallentyre >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
