I believe Google is working on a proposal for an oob URI value to use as the redirection URI.
EHL On Jul 26, 2011, at 9:18, "Andrew Arnott" <andrewarn...@gmail.com<mailto:andrewarn...@gmail.com>> wrote: Trying a different DL... -- Andrew Arnott "I [may] not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it." - S. G. Tallentyre On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:38 AM, Andrew Arnott <<mailto:andrewarn...@gmail.com>andrewarn...@gmail.com<mailto:andrewarn...@gmail.com>> wrote: The recent OAuth 2 specs seem to omit the scenario of a client that cannot host or invoke a browser but could display a URL to the user and ask the user to enter a PIN. Was this an intentional omission? If I am correct, this forces those clients to continue to use OAuth 1.0, which is not only less desirable but it will limit which services they can access. Thoughts? -- Andrew Arnott "I [may] not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it." - S. G. Tallentyre _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org<mailto:OAuth@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
