Perfect. I'll make this change after the last call before sending this to IETF LC.
EHL From: Torsten Lodderstedt <tors...@lodderstedt.net<mailto:tors...@lodderstedt.net>> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:59:19 -0700 To: Brian Campbell <bcampb...@pingidentity.com<mailto:bcampb...@pingidentity.com>> Cc: Eran Hammer-lahav <e...@hueniverse.com<mailto:e...@hueniverse.com>>, oauth <oauth@ietf.org<mailto:oauth@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] treatment of client_id for authentication and identification +1 Am 28.07.2011 15:10, schrieb Brian Campbell: I would be very much in favor of that addition/clarification. On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Eran Hammer-Lahav<e...@hueniverse.com<mailto:e...@hueniverse.com>> wrote: [...] and I can also add a short note that public clients may use the client_id for the purpose of identification with the token endpoint. EHL
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
