How's this?

   The authorization server MUST support Transport Layer Security
   (at the time of this writing, the latest version is specified in
   [RFC5246]). It MAY support additional transport-layer mechanisms
   meeting its security requirements.

On 8/16/11 1:55 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
> We should relax it. Just need someone to propose new language.
> 
> EHL
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
>> Of Justin Richer
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 12:49 PM
>> To: Rob Richards
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] TLS 1.2
>>
>> As I recall, the logic of the group here was something like:
>>
>> "We want transport-layer encryption, so let's grab the latest version of that
>> around, which looks to be TLS 1.2"
>>
>> With that logic in mind, this relaxation makes sense to me. Does anyone
>> remember this requirement differently?
>>
>>  -- Justin
>>     (who admittedly couldn't tell the difference between SSL and TLS)
>>
>> On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 15:36 -0400, Rob Richards wrote:
>>> I wanted to follow up on this and see if there was any consideration
>>> to relaxing this requirement. Can someone actually point me to a
>>> compliant implementation using TLS 1.2 because after looking at a
>>> number of them, I have yet to find one that does.
>>>
>>> Rob
>>>
>>> On 8/12/11 3:56 PM, Rob Richards wrote:
>>>> The latest draft shows TLS 1.2 as a MUST (sections 3.1 and 3.2).
>>>> Based on a thread about this from last year I was under the
>>>> impression that it was going to be relaxed to a SHOULD with most
>>>> likely TLS 1.0 (or posssibly SSLv3) as a MUST. I think it's a bit
>>>> unrealistic to require
>>>> 1.2 when many systems out there can't support it. IMO this is going
>>>> to be a big stumbling block for people to implement a compliant
>>>> OAuth system. Even PCI doesn't require 1.2.
>>>>
>>>> Rob
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OAuth mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OAuth mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth


-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to