+1 Huilan
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rob > Richards > Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 3:46 PM > To: Eran Hammer-Lahav > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] TLS 1.2 > > On 8/18/11 2:31 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Rob Richards [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 1:34 PM > >> The authorization server SHOULD support TLS 1.2 as defined in [RFC5246] but > >> at a minimum MUST support TLS 1.0 as defined in [RFC2246], and MAY > >> support additional transport-layer mechanisms meeting its security > >> requirements. > > How about: > > > > The authorization server MUST support TLS 1.0 ([RFC2246]), SHOULD support > > TLS > 1.2 ([RFC5246]) and its future replacements, and MAY support additional > transport- > layer mechanisms meeting its security requirements. > > > > EHL > > > > > > That works > > Rob > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
