Hi Hannes-- That's kind of a cool idea. You're right that it's a "client account" of sorts. At least worth exploring, I'd say, unless a SCIM expert pipes up with a reason why not.
Eve On 13 Apr 2012, at 7:36 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > Hi all, > > at the IETF#83 OAuth working group meeting we had some confusion about the > Dynamic Client Registration and the Simple Web Discovery item. I just > listened to the audio recording again. > > With the ongoing mailing list discussion regarding WebFinger vs. Simple Web > Discovery I hope that folks had a chance to look at the documents again and > so the confusion of some got resolved. > > I believe the proposed new charter item is sufficiently clear with regard to > the scope of the work. Right? > Here is the item again: > " > Jul. 2013 Submit 'OAuth Dynamic Client Registration Protocol' to the IESG > for consideration as a Proposed Standard > > [Starting point for the work will be > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hardjono-oauth-dynreg > ] > " > > Of course there there is a relationship between Simple Web Discovery (or > WebFinger) and the dynamic client registration since the client first needs > to discover the client registration endpoint at the authorization server > before interacting with it. > > Now, one thing that just came to my mind when looking again at > draft-hardjono-oauth-dynreq was the following: Could the Client Registration > Request and Response protocol exchange could become a profile of the SCIM > protocol? In some sense this exchange is nothing else than provisioning an > account at the Authorization Server (along with some meta-data). > > Is this too far fetched? > > Ciao > Hannes > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth Eve Maler http://www.xmlgrrl.com/blog +1 425 345 6756 http://www.twitter.com/xmlgrrl _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth