On 28/02/13 17:49, William Mills wrote:
The JWT replaces the oauth_token data element in the old MAC stuff. I
just want to take all the other oauth_* variables and stuff them in a
separate JSON object and completely kill the "fun with sorting
variables" when the oauth_* things can be carried in the query string or
header or post body.
As far as the client accessing RS is concerned, should it be limited to
using a header, same as for other OAuth2 tokens ?
Cheers, Sergey
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Sergey Beryozkin <sberyoz...@gmail.com>
*To:* oauth@ietf.org
*Sent:* Thursday, February 28, 2013 9:04 AM
*Subject:* Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-v2-http-mac-03.txt
Hi
On 28/02/13 13:14, William Mills wrote:
> I'm actually advocating that we change MAC to be a JWT extension.
IMHO, having a simpler option, plus, going forward, a possible JWT
profile (client to RS path) would work better -
Why would JWT completely take over ? May be it should be possible indeed
to have it as a JWT extension - should it be part of the relevant JWT
assertion spec, where JWT is used as a possible grant ?
Thanks, Sergey
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net
<mailto:hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net>>
> *To:* William Mills <wmills_92...@yahoo.com
<mailto:wmills_92...@yahoo.com>>
> *Cc:* Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net
<mailto:hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net>>; "oauth@ietf.org
<mailto:oauth@ietf.org>"
> <oauth@ietf.org <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>>
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 28, 2013 2:28 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-v2-http-mac-03.txt
>
> Hi Bill,
>
> I believe you are misreading the document. In
> draft-ietf-oauth-v2-http-mac the client still uses the MAC when it
> accesses a protected resource.
> The only place where the JWT comes into the picture is with the
> description of the access token. This matters from a key distribution
> point of view. The session key for the MAC is included in the encrypted
> JWT. The JWT is encrypted by the authorization server and decrypted by
> the resource server.
>
> Information about how header fields get included in the MAC is described
> in Section 5.
>
> The nonce isn't killed it is just called differently: seq-nr. The stuff
> in the original MAC specification actually wasn't a nonce (from the
> semantic point of view).
> The extension parameter is there implicitly by allowing additional
> header fields to be included in the MAC computation.
>
> I need to look at the port number field again.
>
> Ciao
> Hannes
>
> On Feb 27, 2013, at 11:12 AM, William Mills wrote:
>
> > Just read the draft quickly.
> >
> > Since we're now leaning on JWT do we need to include the token in
> this? Why not just make an additional "Envelope MAC" thing and have the
> signature include the 3 JWT parts in the signature base string? That
> object then just becomes a JSON container for the kid, timestamp,
> signature method, signature etc. That thing then is a 4th base64 encoded
> JSON thing in the auth header.
> >
> > How header fields get included in the signature needs definition.
> >
> > Why did you kill the port number, nonce, and extension parameter out
> of the signature base string?
> >
> > The BNF appears to have no separators between values.
> >
> > -bill
> >
> >
> > From: "internet-dra...@ietf.org <mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org>
<mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org <mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org>>"
> <internet-dra...@ietf.org <mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org>
<mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org <mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org>>>
> > To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org <mailto:i-d-annou...@ietf.org>
<mailto:i-d-annou...@ietf.org <mailto:i-d-annou...@ietf.org>>
> > Cc: oauth@ietf.org <mailto:oauth@ietf.org> <mailto:oauth@ietf.org
<mailto:oauth@ietf.org>>
> > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 4:46 AM
> > Subject: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-v2-http-mac-03.txt
> >
> >
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> > This draft is a work item of the Web Authorization Protocol Working
> Group of the IETF.
> >
> > Title : OAuth 2.0 Message Authentication Code (MAC) Tokens
> > Author(s) : Justin Richer
> > William Mills
> > Hannes Tschofenig
> > Filename : draft-ietf-oauth-v2-http-mac-03.txt
> > Pages : 26
> > Date : 2013-02-25
> >
> > Abstract:
> > This specification describes how to use MAC Tokens in HTTP requests
> > to access OAuth 2.0 protected resources. An OAuth client willing to
> > access a protected resource needs to demonstrate possession of a
> > crytographic key by using it with a keyed message digest function to
> > the request.
> >
> > The document also defines a key distribution protocol for obtaining a
> > fresh session key.
> >
> >
> > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-http-mac
> >
> > There's also a htmlized version available at:
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-http-mac-03
> >
> > A diff from the previous version is available at:
> > http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-oauth-v2-http-mac-03
> >
> >
> > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OAuth mailing list
> > OAuth@ietf.org <mailto:OAuth@ietf.org> <mailto:OAuth@ietf.org
<mailto:OAuth@ietf.org>>
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org <mailto:OAuth@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org <mailto:OAuth@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
