-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 3/25/13 9:14 AM, Justin Richer wrote: > No problem, it's important that we be very precise about this bit > of text. There are many terms in this space with subtle differences > between them, so I'm glad to have others with more experience > reading over it.
RFC 6365 is your friend. :-) And no, I have not read the entire thread on the topic here, but if pressed into service I will review the proposed text. This i18n stuff can be tricky. ;-) Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRUPqwAAoJEOoGpJErxa2pqGEP/AsJ+6Tknwh/KinjSazu4J+W ENn4S3g4xmslGIyePDSZMM9gu2+/HEVREsS+g3dN7luraQSnRgKGNJsykyk2oXPf /SoOzL9m2Y4KfF6sMcMH4wBizfd5AiravqMcVJKgBfmmu3L/F4tjr5+b5IqdLZGq 8gST/SUCwtTGcK/Une8Hl5x+DBb0qgJz30gv3fbuC0R6XRwuPZuX+cvrCoUTYVB9 hJGF26QS7F08Kexc5liRRJqbmkb2Y5W0d5SY4d/+il2VyUkHbyg4FlNcruGrQsHk F3r5LId57ghobD9RaXj16uQHMRgSgNgslIjYIFDobWgB55gYckNmMw6h3tX3VCih UeRHLltd3s+zYCAf6pSBmcej8H3bR3TnCIuK7NqsqBfrQDDAFok9WECyjxHkc7xt tPltZmBg/W+Xi4qEEkk+hf+HoeWh0/4XXnmiIh10gvuJJjbul60LeaCM1VLJo0Nj WbMJfQv1kY4Dh+OpVzW+41WXYDPJOUVzXlR7EIDopob7JEhRvPnMVRFTAueCI2x7 6s56RVOXDRGXOygcX+3A+WuzqRX0HK7PYdEjOdnhNklBaCnbCCVTQPTGvzWsN/Dr 2dP2tz5sCTzzylbx+TwmMb8m5C9D1/DYN8e2la4eZQf3Vp+HQpMCvQEohWcYp/34 PnvAa39wUT+2hF0fnDxH =4HvZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
