Except for the cases where you want step 1 to happen in band. To me,
that is a vitally and fundamentally important use case that we can't
disregard, and we must have a solution that can accommodate that. The
notions of "publisher" and "product" fade very quickly once you get
outside of the software vendor world.
This is, of course, not to stand in the way of other solutions or
approaches (such as something assertion based like you're after). It's
not a one-or-the-other proposition, especially when there are mutually
exclusive aspects of each.
Therefore I once again call for the WG to finish the current dynamic
registration spec *AND* pursue the assertion based process that Phil's
talking about. They're not mutually exclusive, let's please stop talking
about them like they are.
-- Justin
On 08/28/2013 11:17 AM, Phil Hunt wrote:
Sorry. I meant also to say i think there are 2 registration steps.
1. Software registration/approval. This often happens out of band. But in this
step policy is defined that approves software for use. Many of the reg params
are known here.
Federation techniques come into play as trust approvals can be based on
developer, product or even publisher.
2. Each instance associates in a stateless way. Only clients that need
credential rotation need more.
Phil
On 2013-08-28, at 8:04, Phil Hunt <phil.h...@oracle.com> wrote:
I have a conflict I cannot get out of for 2pacific.
I think a certificate based approach is going to simplify exchanges in all
cases. I encourage the group to explore the concept on the call.
I am not sure breaking dyn reg up helps. It creates yet another option. I would
like to explore how federation concept in software statements can help with
facilitating association and making many reg stateless.
Phil
On 2013-08-28, at 5:43, "Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)"
<hannes.tschofe...@nsn.com> wrote:
Here are the conference bridge / Webex details for the call today.
We are going to complete the use case discussions from last time (Phil wasn't
able to walk through all slides). Justin was also able to work out a strawman
proposal based on the discussions last week and we will have a look at it to
see whether this is a suitable compromise. Here is Justin's mail, in case you
have missed it: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg12036.html
Phil, please feel free to make adjustments to your slides given the Justin's
recent proposal.
Topic: OAuth Dynamic Client Registration
Date: Wednesday, August 28, 2013
Time: 2:00 pm, Pacific Daylight Time (San Francisco, GMT-07:00)
Meeting Number: 703 230 586
Meeting Password: oauth
-------------------------------------------------------
To join the online meeting
-------------------------------------------------------
1. Go to
https://nsn.webex.com/nsn/j.php?ED=269567657&UID=0&PW=NNTI1ZWQzMDJk&RT=MiM0
2. Enter your name and email address.
3. Enter the meeting password: oauth
4. Click "Join Now".
To view in other time zones or languages, please click the link:
https://nsn.webex.com/nsn/j.php?ED=269567657&UID=0&PW=NNTI1ZWQzMDJk&ORT=MiM0
To add this meeting to your calendar program (for example Microsoft Outlook),
click this link:
https://nsn.webex.com/nsn/j.php?ED=269567657&UID=0&ICS=MI&LD=1&RD=2&ST=1&SHA2=C6-AjLGvhdYjmpVdx75M6UsAwrNLMsequ5n95Gyv1R8=&RT=MiM0
-------------------------------------------------------
To join the teleconference only
-------------------------------------------------------
Global dial-in Numbers: http://www.nokiasiemensnetworks.com/nvc
Conference Code: 944 910 5485
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
