Yes, IANA can't act upon this until JWT is an RFC. If you point us to your
draft defining new claims, however, I'd be glad review your proposed claims
usage, if you're interested in that.
Best wishes,
-- Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bill Burke
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 2:05 PM
To: Brian Campbell
Cc: oauth
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer != access tokens (was Re:
draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer Shepherd Write-up)
On 4/25/2014 4:12 PM, Brian Campbell wrote:
>
> IHMO getting everyone to agree on the specific claims etc. needed for
> a standardized JWT access token is a bit of a rat's nest, which is why
> there's not been much progress in that area.
>
I guess any IANA registry submissions for new JWT claims is premature until an
RFC is out for JWT? Or are people writing drafts for their own personal claims?
Thanks.
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
