Yes, IANA can't act upon this until JWT is an RFC. If you point us to your draft defining new claims, however, I'd be glad review your proposed claims usage, if you're interested in that.
Best wishes, -- Mike -----Original Message----- From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bill Burke Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 2:05 PM To: Brian Campbell Cc: oauth Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer != access tokens (was Re: draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer Shepherd Write-up) On 4/25/2014 4:12 PM, Brian Campbell wrote: > > IHMO getting everyone to agree on the specific claims etc. needed for > a standardized JWT access token is a bit of a rat's nest, which is why > there's not been much progress in that area. > I guess any IANA registry submissions for new JWT claims is premature until an RFC is out for JWT? Or are people writing drafts for their own personal claims? Thanks. -- Bill Burke JBoss, a division of Red Hat http://bill.burkecentral.com _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth