I know a number of people implementing > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sakimura-oauth-tcse-03
Having it on a RFC track may make sense. I remain to be convinced that a4c ads anything other than confusion. If the WG wants to take it up it should be aligned with Connect. I think there are more important things to spend time on. Sent from my iPhone > On May 14, 2014, at 2:24 PM, Brian Campbell <bcampb...@pingidentity.com> > wrote: > > I would object to 'OAuth Authentication' being picked up by the WG as a work > item. The starting point draft has expired and it hasn't really been > discusses since Berlin nearly a year ago. As I recall, there was only very > limited interest in it even then. I also don't believe it fits well with the > WG charter. > > I would suggest the WG consider picking up 'OAuth Symmetric Proof of > Possession for Code Extension' for which there is an excellent starting point > of http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sakimura-oauth-tcse-03 - it's a > relativity simple security enhancement which addresses problems currently > being encountered in deployments of native clients. > > > > >> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Hannes Tschofenig >> <hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> you might have seen that we pushed the assertion documents and the JWT >> documents to the IESG today. We have also updated the milestones on the >> OAuth WG page. >> >> This means that we can plan to pick up new work in the group. >> We have sent a request to Kathleen to change the milestone for the OAuth >> security mechanisms to use the proof-of-possession terminology. >> >> We also expect an updated version of the dynamic client registration >> spec incorporating last call feedback within about 2 weeks. >> >> We would like you to think about adding the following milestones to the >> charter as part of the re-chartering effort: >> >> ----- >> >> Nov 2014 Submit 'Token introspection' to the IESG for consideration as a >> Proposed Standard >> Starting point: <draft-richer-oauth-introspection-04> >> >> Jan 2015 Submit 'OAuth Authentication' to the IESG for consideration as >> a Proposed Standard >> Starting point: <draft-hunt-oauth-v2-user-a4c-01> >> >> Jan 2015 Submit 'Token Exchange' to the IESG for consideration as a >> Proposed Standard >> Starting point: <draft-jones-oauth-token-exchange-00> >> >> ----- >> >> We also updated the charter text to reflect the current situation. Here >> is the proposed text: >> >> ----- >> >> Charter for Working Group >> >> >> The Web Authorization (OAuth) protocol allows a user to grant a >> third-party Web site or application access to the user's protected >> resources, without necessarily revealing their long-term credentials, >> or even their identity. For example, a photo-sharing site that >> supports OAuth could allow its users to use a third-party printing Web >> site to print their private pictures, without allowing the printing >> site to gain full control of the user's account and without having the >> user share his or her photo-sharing sites' long-term credential with >> the printing site. >> >> The OAuth 2.0 protocol suite encompasses >> >> * a protocol for obtaining access tokens from an authorization >> server with the resource owner's consent, >> * protocols for presenting these access tokens to resource server >> for access to a protected resource, >> * guidance for securely using OAuth 2.0, >> * the ability to revoke access tokens, >> * standardized format for security tokens encoded in a JSON format >> (JSON Web Token, JWT), >> * ways of using assertions with OAuth, and >> * a dynamic client registration protocol. >> >> The working group also developed security schemes for presenting >> authorization tokens to access a protected resource. This led to the >> publication of the bearer token, as well as work that remains to be >> completed on proof-of-possession and token exchange. >> >> The ongoing standardization effort within the OAuth working group will >> focus on enhancing interoperability and functionality of OAuth >> deployments, such as a standard for a token introspection service and >> standards for additional security of OAuth requests. >> >> ----- >> >> Feedback appreciated. >> >> Ciao >> Hannes & Derek >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > > > -- > > Brian Campbell > Portfolio Architect > @ bcampb...@pingidentity.com > +1 720.317.2061 > Connect with us… > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
