I’d like 10-15 minutes of agenda time to discuss this draft: · http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-oauth-token-exchange-01
I support Nat presenting the two drafts below and the rest of the agenda suggestions that have been made. I believe we should have an all-up discussion on the next steps for the proof-of-possession drafts, and will contribute, but don’t feel compelled to present. The one draft that’s pertinent to the proof-of-possession work that I don’t believe has come up in the agenda-setting is http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-richer-oauth-signed-http-request-01. I realize that this might be problematic to discuss, since Justin may not be able to attend, but I wanted us to at least consider whether to include this in the discussions. Looking forward to seeing many of you in Toronto! -- Mike From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Nat Sakimura Sent: Friday, July 04, 2014 8:28 AM To: Justin Richer Cc: oauth@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Agenda requests, please I would like to bring up the request by JWS draft http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sakimura-oauth-requrl-05 and Symmetric PoP draft http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sakimura-oauth-tcse-03. =nat via iPhone On Jul 3, 2014, at 12:14, Justin Richer <jric...@mit.edu<mailto:jric...@mit.edu>> wrote: Mike is working on editorial updates to the Dynamic Registration core draft, and I and the other editors plan to review the changes soon and we'll get an updated draft published before the deadline this week. I will publish a refreshed Token Introspection individual submission ID for input into the WG discussion before the deadline, and I would like to see this become a WG item. It's already been in deployment with a number of implementations for some time now, and I'm seeing only increasing demand for it. I do not agree that we should drop the Dynamic Registration Management draft from the WG items list. -- Justin On 7/2/2014 10:06 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: Hi all, by next Monday we have to post a draft agenda for the upcoming IETF meeting. If you would like to talk about a specific topic, please let us know. My impression regarding the status of our work is the following: -------- Current WG items ------- * Dynamic Client Registration We are waiting for an update but the document could be completed by the IETF meeting. ==> no presentation time. * JWT Currently in IESG processing and a new draft update has just been submitted. ==> no presentation time (#) * Assertion Bundle Currently in IESG processing. ==> no presentation time (#) * Dynamic Client Registration Management Protocol We had a discussion about this work at the last IETF meeting and the path forward looked somewhat difficult. Nothing has happened since that time and I am inclined to remove it from the list of WG items. * Proof-of-Possession Security We have several new documents and I hope we can turn into working group items already before the meeting. We would then use the meeting time to discuss open issues. #: No presentation time unless some challenging comments from the IESG surface. -------- Proposed New WG items ------- I would also like to put the following items on the agenda. * Token Introspection * draft-sakimura-oauth-tcse-03 -------- Other items ------- Phil might want to bring up this item since it was discussed on the list: draft-hunt-oauth-v2-user-a4c Other ideas/suggestions? Ciao Hannes _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org<mailto:OAuth@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org<mailto:OAuth@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
