Forwarding this to the WG. There is a word missing in the sentence noted below as well as in the similar sentence in the SAML draft. However, I believe it should be "to the client" rather than "about the client".
What is the most appropriate way to handle a minor fix like this at this stage? A note to the RFC editor? Or should I push new drafts? https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer-11#section-7 https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer-22#section-7 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Benjamin Trofatter <trofat...@google.com> Date: Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 8:11 PM Subject: draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer draft errors To: m...@microsoft.com, brian.d.campb...@gmail.com, cmortim...@salesforce.com Hi, I was reading your draft and noticed a couple of typos. In 7 Privacy paragraph 1, the last sentence reads: "In cases where it is desirable to prevent disclosure of certain information the client, the JWT should be be encrypted to the authorization server." I'm guessing this ought to say something like: "In cases where it is desirable to prevent disclosure of certain information about the client, the JWT should be encrypted to the authorization server." Hope this helps, Ben *_______________________________________________* Ben Trofatter // Software Engineer // trofatter@g oogle.com // (650) 279-0512
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
