Hi Torsten, does this mean that your implementation is not compliant with the current version anymore or that you haven't had time to verify whether there are differences to the earlier version?
Ciao Hannes On 01/31/2015 05:34 PM, Torsten Lodderstedt wrote: > Deutsche Telekom also implemented an early version of the draft last year. > > > > Am 30.01.2015 um 18:50 schrieb Brian Campbell > <bcampb...@pingidentity.com <mailto:bcampb...@pingidentity.com>>: > >> >> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Hannes Tschofenig >> <hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net <mailto:hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net>> wrote: >> >> >> 1) What implementations of the spec are you aware of? >> >> >> We have an AS side implementation of an earlier draft that was >> released in June of last year: >> http://documentation.pingidentity.com/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=26706844 >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org <mailto:OAuth@ietf.org> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
