In sec 6 you can send scope to down scope a refresh token.

In that case if the client asks for a scope that was not part of the original 
code grant then you would  return invalid_scope.

It is not an error in the spec.

Regards
John B.

> On Jul 7, 2015, at 11:42 AM, Aaron Parecki <aa...@parecki.com> wrote:
> 
> Section 4.1.1 describes the parameters of the *authorization* request, not 
> the token request. After the user approves the scope in the authorization 
> request, the client exchanges the code for the access token. I'm talking 
> about the token request, where there is no scope parameter listed, section 
> 4.1.3 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#section-4.1.3 
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#section-4.1.3>
> 
> ----
> Aaron Parecki
> aaronparecki.com <http://aaronparecki.com/>
> @aaronpk <http://twitter.com/aaronpk>
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Antonio Sanso <asa...@adobe.com 
> <mailto:asa...@adobe.com>> wrote:
> hi Aaron
> 
> On Jul 7, 2015, at 6:23 AM, Aaron Parecki <aa...@parecki.com 
> <mailto:aa...@parecki.com>> wrote:
> 
>> Section 5.2 lists the possible errors the authorization server can return 
>> for an access token request. In the list is "invalid_scope", which as I 
>> understand it, can only be returned for a "password" or "client_credentials" 
>> grant, since scope is not a parameter of an "authorization_code" grant. 
> 
> why not :) ? From https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#section-4.1.1 
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#section-4.1.1> 
> 
>  scope
>          OPTIONAL.  The scope of the access request as described by
>          Section 3.3 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#section-3.3>.
> regards
> 
> antonio
> 
>> 
>> Because of this, I believe the phrase "or exceeds the scope granted by the 
>> resource owner." is unnecessary, since there is no initial grant by the 
>> resource owner. Am I reading this correctly, or is there some situation I am 
>> not thinking of? Thanks!
>> 
>> ----
>> Aaron Parecki
>> aaronparecki.com <http://aaronparecki.com/>
>> @aaronpk <http://twitter.com/aaronpk>
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> OAuth@ietf.org <mailto:OAuth@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth 
>> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to