So, you just removed every relationship to OAuth (and the note about OAuth and authentication seems a bit out of context), and I thus wonder why the OAuth WG would adopt this draft; that'd rather be a JOSE thing.
Le ven. 12 févr. 2016 07:03, Mike Jones <michael.jo...@microsoft.com> a écrit : > This draft of the Authentication Method Reference Values specification > incorporates OAuth working group feedback from the call for adoption. The > primary change was to remove the “amr_values” request parameter, so that “ > amr” values can still be returned as part of an authentication result, > but cannot be explicitly requested. Also, noted that OAuth 2.0 is > inadequate for authentication without employing appropriate extensions and > changed the IANA registration procedure to no longer require a > specification. > > > > The specification is available at: > > · http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-oauth-amr-values-05 > > > > An HTML-formatted version is also available at: > > · http://self-issued.info/docs/draft-jones-oauth-amr-values-05.html > > > > -- Mike > > > > P.S. This announcement was also posted at http://self-issued.info/?p=1539 > and as @selfissued <https://twitter.com/selfissued>. > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
