As Hannes wrote about this draft in his note on February 4th at 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/Y7IUMzngKE0GXXNloUWw4UPBk1o:

With my co-chair hat on: I just wanted to clarify that registering
claims (and values within those claims) is within the scope of the OAuth
working group. We standardized the JWT in this group and we are also
chartered to standardize claims, as we are currently doing with various
drafts. Not standardizing JWT in the IETF would have lead to reduced
interoperability and less security.

From: Thomas Broyer [mailto:t.bro...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 12:32 AM
To: Mike Jones <michael.jo...@microsoft.com>; oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Authentication Method Reference Values spec 
incorporating adoption feedback


So, you just removed every relationship to OAuth (and the note about OAuth and 
authentication seems a bit out of context), and I thus wonder why the OAuth WG 
would adopt this draft; that'd rather be a JOSE thing.

Le ven. 12 févr. 2016 07:03, Mike Jones 
<michael.jo...@microsoft.com<mailto:michael.jo...@microsoft.com>> a écrit :
This draft of the Authentication Method Reference Values specification 
incorporates OAuth working group feedback from the call for adoption.  The 
primary change was to remove the “amr_values” request parameter, so that “amr” 
values can still be returned as part of an authentication result, but cannot be 
explicitly requested.  Also, noted that OAuth 2.0 is inadequate for 
authentication without employing appropriate extensions and changed the IANA 
registration procedure to no longer require a specification.

The specification is available at:

•       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-oauth-amr-values-05

An HTML-formatted version is also available at:

•       http://self-issued.info/docs/draft-jones-oauth-amr-values-05.html

                                                          -- Mike

P.S.  This announcement was also posted at http://self-issued.info/?p=1539 and 
as @selfissued<https://twitter.com/selfissued>.
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org<mailto:OAuth@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to