Phil,

Right. So what my conditional approvals (11 conditions in total) said was
to drop the word "discovery" from everywhere. This is not a discovery spec.
This is a configuration lookup spec as you correctly points out. So, I am
with you here.

Also, my 2nd conditiion is essentially saying to drop section 3.

One thing that I overlooked and am with you is that we need to be able to
express the AS-RS relationships. I have been preaching this in the other
thread for so many times as you know so I thought I pointed it out, but
missed apparently in my previous comment. So, I would add my 12th
condition:

12. A way to express a list of valid RSs for this AS needs to be added to
section 2.

Best,

Nat

2016-03-11 2:09 GMT+09:00 Phil Hunt (IDM) <phil.h...@oracle.com>:

> I strongly oppose. 2 major issues.
>
> This is not service discovery this is configuration lookup. The client
> must have already discovered the oauth issuer uri and the resource uri.
>
> The objective was to provide a method to ensure the client has a valid set
> of endpoints to prevent mitm of endpoints like the token endpoint to the
> resource server.
>
> The draft does not address the issue of a client being given a bad
> endpoint for an rs. What we end up with is a promiscuous authz service
> giving out tokens to an unwitting client.
>
> Phil
>
> On Mar 10, 2016, at 08:06, Vladimir Dzhuvinov <vladi...@connect2id.com>
> wrote:
>
> +1 to move forward with these
>
> On 10/03/16 17:35, Brian Campbell wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 6:04 AM, Roland Hedberg <roland.hedb...@umu.se> 
> <roland.hedb...@umu.se>
> wrote:
>
>
> I support this document being moved forward with these two changes:
>
> - change name to “OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server Discovery Metadata” as
> proposed by Brian and
> - use the URI path suffix ’oauth-authorization-server’ instead of
> ’openid-configuration’ as proposed by Justin.
>
>
> 18 feb 2016 kl. 14:40 skrev Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net
> :
>
> Hi all,
>
> This is a Last Call for comments on the  OAuth 2.0 Discovery
>
> specification:
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-discovery-01
>
> Since this document was only adopted recently we are running this last
> call for **3 weeks**.
>
> Please have your comments in no later than March 10th.
>
> Ciao
> Hannes & Derek
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing listOAuth@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
> — Roland
>
> ”Everybody should be quiet near a little stream and listen."
> From ’Open House for Butterflies’ by Ruth Krauss
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing listOAuth@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing listOAuth@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>


-- 
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
Chairman, OpenID Foundation
http://nat.sakimura.org/
@_nat_en
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to