With the process of immediate wglc I think we should review all documents more thoroughly before adoption.
As I said I support the work. Phil > On Apr 6, 2016, at 16:02, Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net> wrote: > > Phil, > > we have discussed this concept already for years. In fact, it dates back > to the days of the OAuth base specification and the security > consideration section even talks about it. > > We have had the content of this in the PoP key distribution draft and we > are now moving it into a separate document. > > I am not sure how much longer you want to discuss it. > > Ciao > Hannes > > >> On 04/06/2016 08:07 PM, Phil Hunt (IDM) wrote: >> I would like to have more discussion before wg adoption. >> >> I support the work and am willing to help. >> >> Phil >> >>> On Apr 6, 2016, at 14:25, Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> this is the call for adoption of 'Resource Indicators for OAuth 2.0', see >>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-campbell-oauth-resource-indicators/ >>> >>> Please let us know by April 20th whether you accept / object to the >>> adoption of this document as a starting point for work in the OAuth >>> working group. >>> >>> Note: If you already stated your opinion at the IETF meeting in Buenos >>> Aires then you don't need to re-state your opinion, if you want. >>> >>> The feedback at the BA IETF meeting was the following: ~10 persons >>> for accepting the document and 0 persons against. >>> >>> Ciao >>> Hannes & Derek >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OAuth mailing list >>> OAuth@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
