I'd be in favor of it.

On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 9:28 AM Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten=
40lodderstedt....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

>
>
> Am 16.01.2020 um 16:48 schrieb Justin Richer <jric...@mit.edu>:
>
> Maybe PAR and JAR (and JARM?) end up going out as a bundle of specs.
>
>
> Since Justin brought it up, I would like to know whether the community has
> appetite to standardize JARM as well.
>
> Here is the link to the spec:
> https://openid.net/specs/openid-financial-api-jarm-ID1.html
>
> What do you think?
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>

-- 
_CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged 
material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, 
distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited.  If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately 
by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from your 
computer. Thank you._
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to