I support adoption

-- `Dmitry

On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 7:11 AM Warren Parad <wparad=
[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 to What exactly what Neil said.
>
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 1:20 PM Neil Madden <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I support adoption in principle. It would be good to have some
>> explanation in the draft as to why the existing jwt bearer and mTLS client
>> auth methods are not sufficient, though.
>>
>> -- Neil
>>
>> > On 13 Nov 2025, at 20:04, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef via Datatracker <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > Subject: Call for adoption:
>> draft-schwenkschuster-oauth-spiffe-client-auth-01
>> > (Ends 2025-11-27)
>> >
>> > This message starts a 2-week Call for Adoption for this document.
>> >
>> > Abstract:
>> >   This specification profiles the Assertion Framework for OAuth 2.0
>> >   Client Authentication and Authorization Grants [RFC7521] and JWT
>> >   Profile for OAuth 2.0 Client Authentication and Authorization Grants
>> >   [RFC7523] to enable the use of SPIFFE Verifiable Identity Documents
>> >   (SVIDs) as client credentials in OAuth 2.0.  It defines how OAuth
>> >   clients with SPIFFE credentials can authenticate to OAuth
>> >   authorization servers using their JWT-SVIDs or X.509-SVIDs without
>> >   the need for client secrets.  This approach enhances security by
>> >   enabling seamless integration between SPIFFE-enabled workloads and
>> >   OAuth authorization servers while eliminating the need to distribute
>> >   and manage shared secrets such as static client secrets.
>> >
>> > File can be retrieved from:
>> >
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schwenkschuster-oauth-spiffe-client-auth/
>> >
>> > Please reply to this message keeping [email protected] in copy by
>> indicating
>> > whether you support or not the adoption of this draft as a WG document.
>> > Comments to motivate your preference are highly appreciated.
>> >
>> > Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the
>> Intellectual
>> > Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [2].
>> > Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the
>> provisions
>> > of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any.
>> > Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can
>> be
>> > found at [3].
>> >
>> > Thank you.
>> > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/
>> > [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/
>> > [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > OAuth mailing list -- [email protected]
>> > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list -- [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to