All,

Based on the feedback on the mailing list, we think there is enough support
for this document to be adopted as a WG document.


*Authors,*

Please, submit a new WG -00 draft with the same content of the individual
-01 draft.

Regards,
 Rifaat & Hannes



On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 4:41 PM Justin Richer <[email protected]> wrote:

> I support adoption.
>
>  — Justin
>
> > On Nov 13, 2025, at 3:04 PM, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef via Datatracker <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Subject: Call for adoption:
> draft-schwenkschuster-oauth-spiffe-client-auth-01
> > (Ends 2025-11-27)
> >
> > This message starts a 2-week Call for Adoption for this document.
> >
> > Abstract:
> >   This specification profiles the Assertion Framework for OAuth 2.0
> >   Client Authentication and Authorization Grants [RFC7521] and JWT
> >   Profile for OAuth 2.0 Client Authentication and Authorization Grants
> >   [RFC7523] to enable the use of SPIFFE Verifiable Identity Documents
> >   (SVIDs) as client credentials in OAuth 2.0.  It defines how OAuth
> >   clients with SPIFFE credentials can authenticate to OAuth
> >   authorization servers using their JWT-SVIDs or X.509-SVIDs without
> >   the need for client secrets.  This approach enhances security by
> >   enabling seamless integration between SPIFFE-enabled workloads and
> >   OAuth authorization servers while eliminating the need to distribute
> >   and manage shared secrets such as static client secrets.
> >
> > File can be retrieved from:
> >
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schwenkschuster-oauth-spiffe-client-auth/
> >
> > Please reply to this message keeping [email protected] in copy by
> indicating
> > whether you support or not the adoption of this draft as a WG document.
> > Comments to motivate your preference are highly appreciated.
> >
> > Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectual
> > Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [2].
> > Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the
> provisions
> > of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any.
> > Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can
> be
> > found at [3].
> >
> > Thank you.
> > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/
> > [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/
> > [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OAuth mailing list -- [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>
>
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to