Søren Hauberg wrote: > > I don't do audio processing, so I can't give this a good test, but I do > have a few questions/comments. > > 1) The BuildRequires field in the DESCRIPTION file lists 'ALSA'. Is that > the name of the library you depends on? I would imagine that the library > would be called 'libalsa' or something like that. > Yes it is linked to the ALSA lib -lasound. Not sure which version that is required though. I have alsa-lib 1.0.14a on my (Gentoo) systems. > 2) Would it make sense to integrate this with the 'audio' package, or is a > separate package to be preferred? > It is perhaps best to keep it as separate package , at least until it has been tested by others for a while. > I assume you don't have SVN access. I can give you this, but I'll need your > SourceForge login. > OK. I will get a login name.
/Fredrik ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
