man, 16 11 2009 kl. 22:11 +0100, skrev Paul Sundvall: > As Carlo (?) pointed out, it feels dangerous when every maintainer have > to run rm -rf > I think the suggestion of using a low number of "release persons" do the > dangerous part and having each package maintainer tag their package > might help, although we introduce latency in the chain.
I agree with this suggestion. > Should we keep older versions of packages in the file area on source > forge? If so, I think we have to think the structure over has the number > of packages is quite big and the number of releases grows with time. It > will be tricky to navigate. Should we have a separate "older" directory > where one dumps the older releases upon the release of a new one? People aren't expected to browse the files, so I don't think this matters. People should get the new package by navigating the html pages. Søren ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
