On 25 Nov 2009, at 08:58, Carlo de Falco wrote: > > On 24 Nov 2009, at 11:48, Søren Hauberg wrote: > >> man, 23 11 2009 kl. 10:12 +0100, skrev Carlo de Falco: >>>> Yeah, I've been thinking a bit about this. I guess we would like to >>>> have >>>> a whole bunch of maintainers, meaning we would have many people >>>> with >>>> 'admin' status. I don't really have security concerns as I trust >>>> people >>>> on this list, but the chance of somebody doing something wrong by >>>> accident is just very high. So, I don't think we should take this >>>> route. >>> >>> actually I feel that having many different people manually messing >>> around >>> with the web pages might be even more error prone, at least the SF >>> GUI >>> tools >>> restrict the kind of operations that one can do on the server and >>> they >>> seem >>> to take care automatically of setting file permissions. >> >> But people can't upload HTML this way, right? > > I actually thought this would be possible, I'm going to check on SF > documentation
Actually, https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sourceforge/wiki/Project%20web says it can be done: "Project web content may be uploaded using our File management service or be managed directly using our Shell service." > c. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
