On 20111108@16:37, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote: > On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 4:34 PM, c. <carlo.defa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 8 Nov 2011, at 16:07, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> This looks good. > >> I am just giving my coin in regard to the licencing. > >> GPLv3 is a non-commercial licence (people can not use this code in > >> programs user needs to pay for) > >> LGPL is very similar but allows commercial use. > >> Before deciding please check the rationale > >> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html > > > > Juan Pablo, > > I think what you refer to as "commercial" in your message would be better > > referenced as "proprietary", > > I'm sure Jordi will jump in to correct that at some point, anyway ... :) > > c. > > c. > You are right! > please replace commercial by proprietary. > ... I've read both links: I would release "librsb" LGPL'd (not BSD, however :-); the library is not that unique right now (there are proprietary alternatives to it), so I think it's good enough for now.
pgp4XeQxCqxKr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
_______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
