On 8/11/06, Richard Purdie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 20:46 +1000, Jamie Lenehan wrote: > Turned out to be a little bit more magic to this, but RP's suggestion > was basically correct. After talking with RP on IRC and doing some > more experimentation I finally sorted this out: > > 1. A ${PN}-dbg package which MUST BE be the FIRST package in > PACKAGES. If a .bb defines PACKAGES then this needs to be added as > the first item. If a .bb uses PACKAGES =+ to add additional items > then it needs to be changed to += (ie, from prepend to append.)Just for info, it is valid for packages to use "PACKAGES =+" as sometimes they need to intercept standard directories and in those cases we need to do things differently. Its something that needs to be looked at on a case by case basis though.
Now why didn't someone mention =+ back when I was struggling with PACKAGES a long time ago.... Well, it's good to know it exists now... -- Justin Patrin _______________________________________________ Oe mailing list [email protected] https://www.handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/oe
