On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 07:44 -0700, Justin Patrin wrote:
> On 8/11/06, Richard Purdie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 20:46 +1000, Jamie Lenehan wrote:
> > > Turned out to be a little bit more magic to this, but RP's suggestion
> > > was basically correct. After talking with RP on IRC and doing some
> > > more experimentation I finally sorted this out:
> > >
> > > 1. A ${PN}-dbg package which MUST BE be the FIRST package in
> > > PACKAGES. If a .bb defines PACKAGES then this needs to be added as
> > > the first item. If a .bb uses PACKAGES =+ to add additional items
> > > then it needs to be changed to += (ie, from prepend to append.)
> >
> > Just for info, it is valid for packages to use "PACKAGES =+" as
> > sometimes they need to intercept standard directories and in those cases
> > we need to do things differently. Its something that needs to be looked
> > at on a case by case basis though.
> >
>
> Now why didn't someone mention =+ back when I was struggling with
> PACKAGES a long time ago.... Well, it's good to know it exists now...
If you'd said you needed to prepend to a variable, I'm sure someone
would have said! :)
Richard
_______________________________________________
Oe mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/oe
