That's very interesting, David. Considering that questioning of patterns is exactly what was being done in OFBIZ-81 and you of all people prompted others to dismiss the idea, even when the problem was articulated.
--- "David E. Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The best info to date on these things would be the > Framework Introduction videos and the Best Practices > Guide. > > Of course, anyone who has spent enough time with > OFBiz to have commit access in a certain area should > be familiar enough with the artifacts in that area > to recognize the established patterns. > > It's just like any effort to maintain consistency: > precedence is the key. Of course, precedence should > be questioned and reconsidered regularly and > sometimes even changed. > > If this is a problem, it is the duty of the > community (including me and all of us on this > mailing list) to fix it, especially those who > consider it a problem. > > -David > > > Adam Heath wrote: > > David E. Jones wrote: > >> In general please don't be too quick to change > things, especially that > >> are related to established patterns. Many of > these were established > >> after years of feedback and trying different > things and there are > >> always trade-offs with such things that one must > watch out for. > > > > Ok, so what are the established patterns? Are > they documented anywhere? > > If no one knows them, then expect to have more of > this in the future. >
