Discussion is just one part of decision making. Eventually a decision has to be made. My involvement in that issue was nothing more than it is in most cases: reviewing the decision and commenting on it.
-David Chris Howe wrote:
That's very interesting, David. Considering that questioning of patterns is exactly what was being done in OFBIZ-81 and you of all people prompted others to dismiss the idea, even when the problem was articulated. --- "David E. Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:The best info to date on these things would be the Framework Introduction videos and the Best Practices Guide. Of course, anyone who has spent enough time with OFBiz to have commit access in a certain area should be familiar enough with the artifacts in that area to recognize the established patterns. It's just like any effort to maintain consistency: precedence is the key. Of course, precedence should be questioned and reconsidered regularly and sometimes even changed. If this is a problem, it is the duty of the community (including me and all of us on this mailing list) to fix it, especially those who consider it a problem. -David Adam Heath wrote:things, especially thatDavid E. Jones wrote:In general please don't be too quick to changethese were establishedare related to established patterns. Many ofthings and there areafter years of feedback and trying differentalways trade-offs with such things that one mustwatch out for.they documented anywhere?Ok, so what are the established patterns? AreIf no one knows them, then expect to have more ofthis in the future.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
