Okay, I think I see what you are saying. I'm not sure if I like the
change though... If we do it for field-to-field we would really need
to do it for field-to-env, env-to-field, and env-to-env. My hope for
those fields is to get them totally removed from the simple-method
language. They are already "deprecated" and you'll get log warnings
if you use them. They are really old and stem from the days before
the FlexibleStringExpander and FlexibleMapAccessor were implemented.
I may be missing something though... If there is a reason I'm missing
why we really can't let this dead dog lie, please let me know.
-David
On Jul 27, 2006, at 2:35 PM, Si Chen wrote:
The particular issue is marked as resolved by re-writing the
service in question, but the patch for field-to-field typecasting
was never put back into minilang, so other services would break.
Si
On Jul 27, 2006, at 1:29 PM, David E Jones wrote:
On Jul 24, 2006, at 12:33 PM, Si Chen wrote:
On the issue of stability:
1. I propose that we put this http://jira.undersunconsulting.com/
browse/OFBIZ-500 back into the main code base. It addressed a
typecast issue with field-to-field.
I just took a look at this issue and it seems to be closed and
acknowledged as resolved. Is there something I'm missing?
-David
