On Thursday 04 January 2007 16:20, David E Jones wrote: > Do you still have any interest in possibly getting this into OFBiz > itself? You guys are already under CLAs, so it should be pretty easy > from a legal perspective at the ASF. > > That is, IF you want to of course.
We do! We do! The infrastructure does many things nicely but there is still quite a bit of confusion/complexity in the codebase that we aren't happy about. I guess the best way to get rid of that is to get more eyeballs on it so we should just bite the bullet and put it out there. One of the things we definitely want to do right away is build ScreenWidget bindings for Webslinger so that you can just drop a screen widget declaration in place in the file system and have it go. We'll work on getting something publicly accessible in the next few weeks. > Eventually I think we could and should get OFBiz running on OFBiz for > project and content management. This has come up a few times as we've > moved from one tool and hosting situation to another, but we just > haven't had the resources to fill in the gaps in OFBiz in order to do > so... yet... > > My thought on this is that at least 2-3 of us should commit to > getting our own companies running on it in the next few months, and > then once this has stabilized for us who are using it we should be > _close_ to the point where it will be happy for something like OFBiz. I am committed to getting client control and subcontractor control encoded into a system that Brainfood can internally improve and I want it done this year. The sooner the better. We want to collaborate. Having more people involved will insure that the solutions are more generalized and, therefore, more suitable for a variety of external client solutions. -- Ean Schuessler, CTO [EMAIL PROTECTED] 214-720-0700 x 315 Brainfood, Inc. http://www.brainfood.com
